General
O'Hara & Crough, P. C., Individually and as Assignee of the City of Watertown, et al., Respondents, v. Academy Housing Associates et al., Appellants
202 A.D.2d 1059612 N.Y.S.2d 979·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1994·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’Hara & Crough, P. C., Individually and as Assignee of the City of Watertown, et al., Respondents, v Academy Housing Associates et al., Appellants.
[612 NYS2d 979]
[MAJORITY]
—Motions to strike exhibits from appellants’ brief and for other relief denied. Memorandum: Having elected to prosecute their appeal on a full, reproduced record, appellants were required to file the original record and 14 copies thereof on or before January 26, 1994 (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [b]). Appellants failed to file the necessary copies, and the appeal has been dismissed as abandoned. Plaintiffs’ motions, therefore, are moot. Present —Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.