General

In the Matter of the Application of A. Stroud Haxton for an Order Substituting Other Attorneys in Place of Bijur & Herts, in an Action Pending Entitled "Donald Symington and Others, Plaintiffs, v. A. Stroud Haxton, Defendant."

210 A.D. 874·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1924·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of A. Stroud Haxton for an Order Substituting Other Attorneys in Place of Bijur & Herts, in an Action Pending Entitled “ Donald Symington and Others, Plaintiffs, v. A. Stroud Haxton, Defendant.” [MAJORITY] Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.