Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Valerie C. Majka et al., Respondents, v Samuel T. Rubino, et al., Respondents and St. Luke's Memorial Hospital Center, Appellant
48 A.D.2d 1002·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1975·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Valerie C. Majka et al., Respondents, v Samuel T. Rubino, et al., Respondents and St. Luke’s Memorial Hospital Center, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to move upon a proper showing for an order vacating the default, if so advised. (See McNamara v Hutchinson, 33 AD2d 26; CPLR 3404.) (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term restoring action to Trial Calendar.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Mahoney, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.