Contracts · MBE-tested
Stanislas Dubuc, Respondent, v. Lazell, Dalley & Company, Appellant
185 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stanislas Dubuc, Respondent, v. Lazell, Dalley & Company, Appellant.
Dubuc v. Lazell, Dailey & Co., 102 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
(Argued May 9, 1906;
decided May 25, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 21, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of employment.
Austen G. Fox and George H. Fletcher for appellant.
Lyman E. Warren and Alfred E. Merrill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.