Administrative

James Fitzpatrick, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Respondent

98 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., not voting.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

James Fitzpatrick, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Respondent. (Argued February 11, 1885; decided March 3, 1885.) ~Julii~is L~pm~m for appellant. H. B. Andereon for respondent. [MAJORITY — Per euria~m mem.] Per euria~m mem. for reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in noosuiting plaintiff, that the case should have been submitted to the jury. All concur, except RAPALLO, J., not voting. Judgment reversed.