Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wills v. Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections; Fisch v. Republic of Poland et al.; McCord v. O'Neill; Beatty v. Kerivan; Tatum v. Wolfenbarger, Warden; Maldonado-Arce v. Peters et al.; Lee v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al.; Taylor v. Britten, Warden, et al.; Jackson v. Randalls Food & Drugs, L. P.; Hallford v. California Correctional Peace Officers Assn.; Narayan v. City of Sacramento, California, et al.; Vigliotti v. Daly et al.; Townsend v. Sparkman, Superintendent, Mississippi Correctional Facility; Lewis v. Sherry, Warden; Norwood v. Arkansas State Hospital; Appleby v. Seifert, Warden; Laurence v. Anteon Corp. et al.; Smith v. Cooper, Warden; Dolliver v. United States; Redfearn v. City of Satellite Beach, Florida; O'Bryan v. Eichenlaub, Warden; Clark v. National Credit Union Administration; Cotto v. Bones et al.; 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover, Alabama; Downing v. United States; Jackman v. Department of Justice et al.; and Williams v. Rudolph et al., 2010 — 562 U.S. 819 · caselaw · US