Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ADAMS COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. SPOKANE, PORTLAND & SEATTLE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee, 1933 — 66 F.2d 1008 · caselaw · US
General
ADAMS COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. SPOKANE, PORTLAND & SEATTLE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee
66 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ADAMS COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. SPOKANE, PORTLAND & SEATTLE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 7178.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 14, 1933.
G. W. Hamilton, Atty. Gen., R. G. Sharpe, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John A. Homer, of Seattle, Wash., for appellants.
Carey, Hart, Spencer & McCulloch, of Portland, Or., and L. B. Da Ponte, of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties and consent of Attorney General of tho state of Washington, to such action, ordered appeal (1 E. Supp. 163) dismissed; mandate forthwith.