Contracts · MBE-tested
Rose v. McNamara, Secretary of Defense
389 U.S. 856·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. · Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 272.
Rose v. McNamara, Secretary of Defense.
Warren E. Magee, Hans A. Nathan, William H. Quasha, Howard B. McClellan, Stuart H. Robeson and Roger E. Brooks for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley and Morton Hollander for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.