Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Slade, Appellant, v. Gertrude A. Hale, Individually and as Executrix of Edward C. Hale, Deceased, Respondent, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 543 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Slade, Appellant, v. Gertrude A. Hale, Individually and as Executrix of Edward C. Hale, Deceased, Respondent
179 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Slade, Appellant, v. Gertrude A. Hale, Individually and as Executrix of Edward C. Hale, Deceased, Respondent.
Slade v. Hale, 84 App. Div. 683, affirnied.
(Argued June 7, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered June 17,1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining demurrers to the complaint.
Edmund P. Cottle and 0. 0. Cottle for appellant.
Llelen Z. M. Rodgers and Adolph Rebadow for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J:, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.