General
Adolfo Casola, Respondent, v. Francisco Vasquez, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
164 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adolfo Casola, Respondent, v. Francisco Vasquez, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Casóla v. Kugelman, 33 App. Div. 428, affirmed.
(Argued October 12, 1900;
decided November 20, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 15,1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William H. Blymyer for appellant.
Richard L. Sweezy and O. W. Bennett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Patterson, J., below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin,-Yann and Landon, JJ.