General
PEEBLES v. STATE
23 Ala. App. 568129 So. 308·Alabama Court of Appeals·1930·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(129 So. 308)
PEEBLES v. STATE.
8 Div. 44.
Court of Appeals of Alabama,
June 24, 1930.
John E. MeEachin, of Huntsville, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — SAMFORD, J.]
SAMFORD, J.
The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.