General
W. F. & JOHN BARNES CO. v. VANDYCK CHURCHILL CO. et al.
213 F. 637·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
W. F. & JOHN BARNES CO. v. VANDYCK CHURCHILL CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 10, 1914.)
No. 158.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Suit in equity by the W. F. & John Barnes Company against the Vandyclc Churchill Company and others. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
For opinion below, see 207 Fed. 855.
Offield, Towle, Graves & Offield, of Chicago, Ill. (C. K. Offield, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.
Luther L. Miller, of Chicago, Ill. (Duncan & Duncan, of New York . City, and Lincoln B. Smith, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.
Before COXE, WARD, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mayer, 207 Fed 855.