Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oswald Otero, True Name Oswaldo Otero, Appellant

245 A.D.2d 116665 N.Y.S.2d 888·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1997·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oswald Otero, True Name Oswaldo Otero, Appellant. [665 NYS2d 888] [MAJORITY] —Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered January 9, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, and imposing a mandatory surcharge, unanimously affirmed. Defendant’s challenge to the imposition of the surcharge should be raised in the sentencing court by way of a motion for resentencing after the completion of defendant’s sentence (People v Rada, 160 AD2d 552). Consequently, defendant’s claim is premature (People v Velasquez, 198 AD2d 25, lv denied 82 NY2d 932). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.