Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Estate of John D. Meyer, Deceased. Carsten H. Meyer, as Executor of John D. Meyer, Deceased, Appellant; Wilhelmina C. Stausebach et al., Respondents, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 553 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Estate of John D. Meyer, Deceased. Carsten H. Meyer, as Executor of John D. Meyer, Deceased, Appellant; Wilhelmina C. Stausebach et al., Respondents
181 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of John D. Meyer, Deceased. Carsten H. Meyer, as Executor of John D. Meyer, Deceased, Appellant; Wilhelmina C. Stausebach et al., Respondents.
Matter of Meyer, 98 App. Div. 7, affirmed.
(Submitted April 11, 1905;
decided April 25, 1905.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 22, 1904, which affirmed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court directing the executor herein to make and file his account.
The following question was certified :
“In the absence of any act of an executor repudiating his liability as trustee, is the lapse of thirteen years and nine months from the time of the issue of letters testamentary a bar to a proceeding to compel the executor to account % ”
Terry Smith for appellant.
David K. Case for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. Question certified answered in the negative.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.