Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ruskin, Trustee under Collateral Agreement, v. Griffiths, Trustee in Reorganization of General Stores Corp.; and Griffiths, Trustee in Reorganization of General Stores Corp., v. Ruskin, Trustee under Collateral Agreement, 1960 — 361 U.S. 947 · caselaw · US
Securities
Ruskin, Trustee under Collateral Agreement, v. Griffiths, Trustee in Reorganization of General Stores Corp.; and Griffiths, Trustee in Reorganization of General Stores Corp., v. Ruskin, Trustee under Collateral Agreement
361 U.S. 947·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 569.
No. 592.
Ruskin, Trustee under Collateral Agreement, v. Griffiths, Trustee in Reorganization of General Stores Corp.; and Griffiths, Trustee in Reorganization of General Stores Corp., v. Ruskin, Trustee under Collateral Agreement.
Harry H. Ruskin and Joseph- Rosenbaum for Ruskin, Trustee. Arthur F. Gaynor for. Griffiths, Trustee. Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas G. Meeker .and David Ferber 'filed a brief in No. 569 for the Securities and Exchange Commission in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied,
Reported below: ~269 F. 2d 827.