Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Regan, Appellant, v. Bernard J. York et al., as Police Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondents, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 533 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Regan, Appellant, v. Bernard J. York et al., as Police Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondents
174 N.Y. 533·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Regan, Appellant, v. Bernard J. York et al., as Police Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondents.
People ex rel. Regan v. York, 78 App. Div. 432, affirmed.
(Argued March 18, 1903;
decided April 7, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 30, 1903, which affirmed the proceedings, of the defendants in dismissing the relator from the position of patrolman in the police department of the city of New York.
Folds J. Grcmt for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connol/y and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Cdllen and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Bartlett, J.