Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James A. Farley, et al., Appellants, v. The Union Life Insurance Company, Respondent, 1890 — 118 N.Y. 685 · caselaw · US
General
James A. Farley, et al., Appellants, v. The Union Life Insurance Company, Respondent
118 N.Y. 685·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James A. Farley, et al., Appellants, v. The Union Life Insurance Company, Respondent.
(Argued January 24, 1890 ;
decided February 25, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon .an order made June 28, 1886, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and ordered a new trial.
Raphael J. Moses, Jr., for appellants.
Merritt E. Sawyer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.