General
RPRS GAMING, L.P., as a Limited Partner in and Derivatively on Behalf of HSP Gaming, L.P., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL BOARD and HSP Gaming, L.P., Appellees Tower Entertainment, LLC, Intervenor-Appellee
111 A.3d 746·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2015·PA
Justice STEVENS did not participate in the decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RPRS GAMING, L.P., as a Limited Partner in and Derivatively on Behalf of HSP Gaming, L.P., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL BOARD and HSP Gaming, L.P., Appellees Tower Entertainment, LLC, Intervenor-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 25, 2015.
Richard A. Sprague, Thomas A. Sprague, Joseph R. Podraza, Sprague & Sprague, Philadelphia, for Appellant.
Robert C. Heim, Michael Scott Doluisio, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, Raymond Adam Quaglia, Michael David Matthews Fabius, S. Clifford Sacalis, Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, Richard Douglas Sherman, Stephen S. Cook, David Cornelius Hittinger, Jr., PA Gaming Control Bd., Harrisburg, for Appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2015, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
Justice STEVENS did not participate in the decision of this case.