Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Westminster Heights Company, Respondent, v. Bird S. Coler, as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, Appellant, and the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 554 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Westminster Heights Company, Respondent, v. Bird S. Coler, as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, Appellant, and the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent
189 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Westminster Heights Company, Respondent, v. Bird S. Coler, as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, Appellant, and the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.
People ex rel. Westminster Heights (Jo. v. Ooler, 121 App. Div. 293, reversed.
(Argued October 3, 1907;
decided October 22, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 22,1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the. president of the borough of Brooklyn to issue a permit for the opening of the surface of the street and the construction of a double-track surface railway on Nostrand avenue in said borough.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell of counsel), for appellant.
Ma/ritm W Littleton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order reversed and proceedings dismissed, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that the relator has no standing to maintain them; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Bbien, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.