Corporations
Duane REOTT and Patty Reott, husband and wife v. ASIA TREND, INC., Clam Corporation (as successor-in-interest to USL Outdoor Products, Inc.), USL Outdoor Products, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc., RA Brands, LLC and the Sportsman's Guide. Petition of Asia Trend, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc., RA Brands, LLC and the Sportsman's Guide
20 A.3d 1187·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2011·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Duane REOTT and Patty Reott, husband and wife v. ASIA TREND, INC., Clam Corporation (as successor-in-interest to USL Outdoor Products, Inc.), USL Outdoor Products, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc., RA Brands, LLC and the Sportsman’s Guide. Petition of Asia Trend, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc., RA Brands, LLC and the Sportsman’s Guide.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 23, 2011.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:
1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?
2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of pri- or decisions of that same [c]ourt?