Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johnston et al. v. United States; United States v. Patteson; Coffman v. Ohio; Jolly v. United States; Sawyer v. Barczak, Sheriff; Robinson, Administratrix, v. Northeastern Steamship Corp.; Hadzima v. United States; Lott v. United States, In re Miller, Scher v. Weeks, Secretary of Commerce; Offutt v. United States, 1956 — 352 U.S. 860 · caselaw · US
General
Johnston et al. v. United States; United States v. Patteson; Coffman v. Ohio; Jolly v. United States; Sawyer v. Barczak, Sheriff; Robinson, Administratrix, v. Northeastern Steamship Corp.; Hadzima v. United States; Lott v. United States, In re Miller, Scher v. Weeks, Secretary of Commerce; Offutt v. United States
352 U.S. 860·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 643,
No. 704,
No. 722,
No. 773,
No. 809,
No. 820,
No. 851,
No. 854,
No. 860,
No. 901,
No. 928,
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
October Term, 1955.
Johnston et al. v. United States, United States v. Patteson, Coffman v. Ohio, Jolly v. United States, Sawyer v. Barczak, Sheriff, Robinson, Administratrix, v. Northeastern Steamship Corp., Hadzima v. United States, Lott v. United States, In re Miller, Scher v. Weeks, Secretary of Commerce, Offutt v. United States,
[MAJORITY]
351 U. S. 215;
351 U. S. 215;
351 U. S. 923;
351 U. S. 963;
351 U. S. 966;
351 U. S. 937;
351 U. S. 953;
351 U. S. 953;
351 U. S. 951;
351 U. S. 973; and
351 U. S. 988. Petitions for rehearing denied.