Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, A. F. L., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board; National Labor Relations Board v. General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 886, AFL-CIO; Local 850, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, v. National Labor Relations Board, 1957 — 355 U.S. 808 · caselaw · US
General
Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, A. F. L., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board; National Labor Relations Board v. General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 886, AFL-CIO; Local 850, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, v. National Labor Relations Board
355 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 127.
No. 273.
No. 324.
Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, A. F. L., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board. National Labor Relations Board v. General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 886, AFL-CIO. Local 850, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, v. National Labor Relations Board.
John C. Stevenson for petitioners in No. 127. Plato E. Papps and Louis P. Poulton for petitioner in No. 324. Solicitor General Rankin, Jerome D. Fenton, Stephen Leonard, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board. Herbert S. Thatcher, David Previant and L. N. D. Wells, Jr. for respondent in No. 273.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are severally granted and the cases are consolidated for argument.
Reported below: No. 127, 241 F. 2d 147; Nos. 273 and 324, 101 U. S. App. D. C. 80, 247 F. 2d 71.