General
FRIED v. NEW YORK
378 U.S. 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the judgment reversed.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FRIED v. NEW YORK.
No. 330.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Herbert Monte Levy for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard XJviller for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the judgment reversed.