Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Meyer Shaier, Respondent, v. The Broadway Improvement Company, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Meyer Shaier, Respondent, v. The Broadway Improvement Company, Appellant
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Meyer Shaier, Respondent, v. The Broadway Improvement Company, Appellant.
Shaier v. Broadway Improvement Co., 32 App. Div. 102, affirmed.
(Argued March 28, 1900;
decided April 17, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Charles C. Nadal for appellant.
Francis L. Wellman and Summer B. Stiles for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.