Tax
William H. EDWARDS, Collector of Internal Revenue, Second New York District. Plaintiff in Error (Defendant Below), v. CHILE COPPER COMPANY, Defendant in Error (Plaintiff Below)
5 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. EDWARDS, Collector of Internal Revenue, Second New York District. Plaintiff in Error (Defendant Below), v. CHILE COPPER COMPANY, Defendant in Error (Plaintiff Below).
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 16, 1925.)
No. 177.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
William Hayward, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Thomas J. Crawford, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland, of New York City (Arthur A. Bal-lantine, Carroll A. Wilson, and George E. Cleary, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed, on the opinion of Judge Learned Hand in the court below (294 F. 581).