Corporations
Regency Flowers, Inc. v. United States; Deldan Design, Inc. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1072·United States Customs Court·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
March 6, 1969
No. P69/60.
protests 66/72919, etc. (New York).
No. P69/61.
protests 68/21463, etc. (New York).
Regency Flowers, Inc. v. United States, Deldan Design, Inc. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Watson, J.]
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the plastic artificial flowers in Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.