Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Second National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin D. F. Curtiss et al., as Executors of Charles Curtiss, Deceased, Appellants, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 681 · caselaw · US
General
The Second National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin D. F. Curtiss et al., as Executors of Charles Curtiss, Deceased, Appellants
153 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Second National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin D. F. Curtiss et al., as Executors of Charles Curtiss, Deceased, Appellants.
Second Nat. Bank v. Curtiss, 3 App. Div. 508, affirmed.
(Argued June 16, 1897;
decided October 5, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 11, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.
John A. Taylor for appellants.
Wm. Allen Butler and John Notman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.