Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hugo Cahn et al., Respondents, v. Theodore Stover, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 653 · caselaw · US
General
Hugo Cahn et al., Respondents, v. Theodore Stover, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hugo Cahn et al., Respondents, v. Theodore Stover, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Cahn v. Stover, 25 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Submitted April 4, 1900;
decided April 24, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 14, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John A. Van Arsdale for appellant.
George Clinton for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur; Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.