Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 795 et al. v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc., et al., 1961 — 368 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
General
Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 795 et al. v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc., et al.
368 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 13.
Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 795 et al. v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc., et al.
J. Albert Woll, Theodore J. St. Antoine and Thomas E. Harris on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 364 U. S. 931, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The motion of the American Federation of Labor et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, is granted.