Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Frederick Akers, Deceased. George H. Jefferies, Appellant; James P. Nieman et al., Respondents, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 620 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Frederick Akers, Deceased. George H. Jefferies, Appellant; James P. Nieman et al., Respondents
173 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Frederick Akers, Deceased. George H. Jefferies, Appellant; James P. Nieman et al., Respondents.
Matter of Alters, 74 App. Div. 461, affirmed.
(Argued January 5, 1903;
decided February 10, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 15, 1902, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court admitting to probate the will of Frederick Akers, deceased.
J. Aspinwall Hodge and L. Lafayette Fawcett for appellant.
John Vincent and J. Mayhew Wamwright for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien and Haight, JJ.