Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SECUNDINO MENDEZONA y MENDEZONA v. UNITED STATES, 1904 — 195 U.S. 158 · caselaw · US
General
SECUNDINO MENDEZONA y MENDEZONA v. UNITED STATES
195 U.S. 15849 L. Ed. 136·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Dissenting: Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice McKenna and Mr. Justice Holmes.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SECUNDINO MENDEZONA y MENDEZONA v. UNITED STATES.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT.OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS.
No. 584.
Argued April 22, 1904.
Decided May 31, 1904.
Decided on authority of Kepner v. United States, ante, p. 100.
No brief filed for plaintiff in error.
Mr. L. B. Wilfley, Attorney General for the Philippine Islands and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt, for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Day]
Mr. Justice Day
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case involves the question just decided in Kepner v. United States, ante, p. 100. The plaintiff in error was acquitted in the court of first instance and convicted in the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands.
For the reasons stated in the Kepner case, the judgment herein is reversed, and the prisoner discharged.
Dissenting: Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice McKenna and Mr. Justice Holmes.