Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Madchenheim-Verein, Respondent, v. John T. McDonough, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Appellant, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 598 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Madchenheim-Verein, Respondent, v. John T. McDonough, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Appellant
163 N.Y. 598·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Madchenheim-Verein, Respondent, v. John T. McDonough, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Appellant.
People ex rel. Madchenheim-Verein v. McDonough, 47 App. Div. 629, affirmed.
(Argued June 5, 1900;
decided June 19, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third, judicial department, entered February 14, 1900, affirming an order of Special Term granting an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring tlie defendant, as secretary of state, to tile in his office rela. tor’s certificate of incorporation.
Henry B. Comam, for appellant.
Mornay Williams for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Oh. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Landón and Cullen, J J.