General
Anthony R. Campo vs. The State Department of Health; Modestino Coppola vs. The State Department of Health; William H. Feldman vs. The State Department of Health; Samuel Lerner vs. The State Department of Health; William Levy vs. The State Department of Health
108 Conn. 82·Connecticut Supreme Court·1928·CT
Mai/tbie, Haines, Hinman, Banks and Wolee, Js.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anthony R. Campo vs. The State Department of Health. Modestino Coppola vs. The State Department of Health. William H. Feldman vs. The State Department of Health. Samuel Lerner vs. The State Department of Health. William Levy vs. The State Department of Health.
Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,
April Term, 1928.
Mai/tbie, Haines, Hinman, Banks and Wolee, Js.
Argued April 17th
decided June 18th, 1928.
Samuel E. Hoyt and Harry L. Edlin, for the appellants (plaintiffs Campo and Coppola).
William F. D. Kilpatrick, for the appellants (plaintiffs Feldman, Lerner and Levy).
James W. Carpenter, with whom, on the brief, were Benjamin W. Ailing, Attorney General, Cyril Coleman and J. H. Bartholomew, Jr., for the appellee (defendant).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Each of these appellants appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining the revocation of his license to practice medicine by the State Department of Health under circumstances identical in all material respects with those involved in Mower v. State Department of Health, ante, p. 74. The issues raised are determined adversely to the appellants by our decision in that case.
There is no error in any of these appeals.