Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Gisela Hillery and Another, Respondents, v. L. A. D. Motors Corporation, Appellant, and Frank J. Ancona, Defendant
242 A.D. 795·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1934·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gisela Hillery and Another, Respondents, v. L. A. D. Motors Corporation, Appellant, and Frank J. Ancona, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff was a passenger in a taxicab which swerved from the road and collided with a pole in an attempt to avoid collision with a car on its right, which suddenly turned toward the taxi. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present •— Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ.