General

Mary A. Lane, Respondent, v. C. Augustus Koenig, Appellant, Impleaded, with John Kolenick and Others

137 A.D. 879·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1909·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Fourth Department, October 1909. Mary A. Lane, Respondent, v. C. Augustus Koenig, Appellant, Impleaded, with John Kolenick and Others. These decisions not received in time for publication in their proper place. See 134 App. Div. 955.—[Rep. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred. Hammond Beef Company, Respondent, v. Mary Havriclialc, Appellant.— Judgment of County Court and of Justice’s Court reversed, with costs in all courts to appellant. Held, that the complaint was not verified as required by law so as to entitle the plaintiff to j udgment thereon by default. All concurred, except Spring and Williams, JJ., who dissented. See Code Civ. Proc. §§ 525, 526, 2936, cited by counsel. See, also, Code Civ. Proc. § 2891.— [Rep.