Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Edward B. ROBINETTE
73 F.2d 995·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Edward B. ROBINETTE.
No. 5283.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 3, 1934.
Norman Keller, of Washington, D. C., Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and S. E. Blaekham, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Alfred S. Weill, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Hugh Satterlee, of Washington, D. C. (Weill, Blakely & Nesbit and- Weill, Satterlee, Blakely & Green, all of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for respondent.
Before DAVIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and PANE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented in this ease is identical with that presented in Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Bliss (Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Harbison), 55 S. Ct. 17, 79 L. Ed. -, opinion filed by the Supreme Court on November 5, 1934. Upon authority of those eases, the decision’ of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.