Property · MBE-tested
Improved Property Holding Company of New York, Respondent, v. Bernhard Wexler, Appellant
131 A.D. 893·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1909·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Improved Property Holding Company of New York, Respondent, v. Bernhard Wexler, Appellant.
Appeal from an order, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 18th day of February, 1909, granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
We do nob think that upon the covenant and the facts presented there was a case for a preliminary injunction. Without intimating an opinion as to what disposition the court should make upon the trial, we think the order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for a preliminary in j unction denied, with ten dollars costs. Present —Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.