General
WASHINGTON, B. & A. ELECTRIC R. CO. v. BROOKS
289 F. 603·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WASHINGTON, B. & A. ELECTRIC R. CO. v. BROOKS.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 8, 1922.
Decided May 7, 1923.)
No. 3758.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Action by Fred Brooks against the Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Thomas P. Rittlepage and Sidney F. Taliaferro, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
James J. O’Eeary, Raymond Neudecker, and James A. Cobb, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before SMYTH, Chief Justice ROBB, Associate Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
[MAJORITY — BARBER, Acting Associate Justice.]
BARBER, Acting Associate Justice.
This was a companion case to No. 3759, Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railroad Co., Appellant, v. William A. Waller, 289 Fed. 598, in which opinion is-concurrently filed.
The case comes here in the same manner as that, the relevant facts and the issues are the same, and the plaintiff below here was with the plaintiff below there on the trip from Annapolis, each testifying at the trial for the other in the court below. The cases were argued together in this court. The opinion in the companion case may be referred to.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.