General
In the Matter of the Estate of Walter F. Jennings, Deceased. Irving B. Vigdor et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Vigdor & Locker, Respondents; Arthur V. Jennings, Individually and as an Administrator of the Estate of Walter F. Jennings, Deceased, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Alice V. Jennings, Deceased. Irving B. Vigdor et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Vigdor & Locker, Respondents; Arthur V. Jennings, Individually and as an Administrator with the Will Annexed of Alice V. Jennings, Deceased, Appellant
283 A.D. 1071·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1954·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of Walter F. Jennings, Deceased. Irving B. Vigdor et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Vigdor & Locker, Respondents; Arthur V. Jennings, Individually and as an Administrator of the Estate of Walter F. Jennings, Deceased, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Alice V. Jennings, Deceased. Irving B. Vigdor et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Vigdor & Locker, Respondents; Arthur V. Jennings, Individually and as an Administrator with the Will Annexed of Alice V. Jennings, Deceased, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
The decedents, husband and wife, whose estates are involved in these proceedings, died on July 13, 1948, and their respective estates are being administered together by two brothers of the deceased husband. One of said administrators appeals from a separate order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, entered in each estate, after a hearing before an official referee, directing them to pay certain fees and disbursements to the attorneys for the other administrator. Upon the argument hereof, respondents moved by oral motion to dismiss the appeals herein upon the ground that the respective records filed by appellant are incomplete. Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, payable on each appeal out of the respective estates. No opinion. In view of the foregoing determination, oral motion to dismiss the appeals denied, as academic, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Adel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur. [See 284 App. Div. 850.]