Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Power Commission v. Oregon et al., 1954 — 348 U.S. 868 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Power Commission v. Oregon et al.
348 U.S. 868·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 367.
Federal Power Commission v. Oregon et al.
Solicitor General Sobeloff and Willard W. Gatchell for petitioner.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, E. G. Foxley, Deputy Attorney General, and Arthur G. Higgs, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents. Clarence D. Phillips for the Portland General Electric Co.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Petition of Portland General Electric Co. for leave to intervene denied.