Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United States et al., 1956 — 352 U.S. 935 · caselaw · US
General
Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United States et al.
352 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 489.
Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United States et al.
Paul A. Porter and George Bunn for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Warren E. Baker, Richard A. Solomon and Daniel R. Ohlbaum for the United States and the Federal Communications Commission, and D. M. Patrick for the Hudson Valley Broadcasting Co., Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.