General
Ramona Productions, Inc., Respondent, v. WBC Productions, Inc., et al., Defendants; Group W. Productions, Inc., Interpleading Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Millard Lampbell et al., Interpleaded Defendants
51 A.D.2d 524·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1976·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ramona Productions, Inc., Respondent, v WBC Productions, Inc., et al., Defendants. Group W. Productions, Inc., Interpleading Plaintiff-Appellant, v Millard Lampbell et al., Interpleaded Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 12, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Technically, there was no default on the return date of the motion since plaintiff appeared through its lawyer’s service and sought, unsuccessfully, to consent to a conditional 30-day order. Its motion for reargument, though treated as a motion to open a default, was properly granted in the court’s discretion (CPLR 5015, subd [a], par 1), and the conditions imposed have apparently been satisfied. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.