Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawrence L. WELLER, Appellant, v. HORSE HEAVEN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, etc., et al., Appellees, 1933 — 66 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
Lawrence L. WELLER, Appellant, v. HORSE HEAVEN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, etc., et al., Appellees
66 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence L. WELLER, Appellant, v. HORSE HEAVEN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 7067.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct 16, 1933.
W. F. Crowe, of Walla Walla, Wash., for appellant.
Harold H. Hartman, of Seattle, Wash., Fred J. Cunningham, of Spokane, Wash., and Warren H. Lewis, of Seattle, Wash., for appellees Hartman and others.
F. B. Sharpstein, of Walla Walla, Wash., for appellees Horse Heaven Irrigation District and Directors.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for all parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.