Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HEIMAN GROCERY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah CROOKS, Collector, etc., 1931 — 50 F.2d 1077 · caselaw · US
General
HEIMAN GROCERY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah CROOKS, Collector, etc.
50 F.2d 1077·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HEIMAN GROCERY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah CROOKS, Collector, etc.
No. 9065.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
April 15, 1931.
A. E. Watson and Daniel C. Ketchum, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.
William L. Vandeventer, U. S. Atty., and Harry L. Thomas, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed at costs of appellant, on motion of appellant. [44 F.(2d) 854].