General
American Home Assurance Company et al., Respondents, v. Flushing Savings Bank et al., Appellants
71 A.D.2d 599·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1979·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(July 12, 1979)
American Home Assurance Company et al., Respondents, v Flushing Savings Bank et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted only to the extent of deleting the third sentence of the third paragraph of the first page of the opinion filed with the order of this court entered on May 17, 1979 (68 AD2d 170), and substituting therefor the following sentence: While the motion was pending, Sackman was requested by Parr Meadows to agree that Parr Meadows, its successors and assigns, would have undisturbed use of the sewage plant and that such use would not be disturbed by any foreclosure action, in order to facilitate negotiations for financing construction of the racetrack. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.