Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Palermo v. United States; Sica v. United States; Carbo v. United States; and Gibson v. United States, 1964 — 377 U.S. 953 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Palermo v. United States; Sica v. United States; Carbo v. United States; and Gibson v. United States
377 U.S. 953·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 122.
No. 134.
No. 141.
No. 145.
Palermo v. United States; Sica v. United States; Carbo v. United States; and Gibson v. United States.
Jacob Kossman for petitioner in No. 122.
Russell E. Parsons for petitioner in No. 134.
William B. Beirne, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioner in No. 141.
William R. Ming, Jr. and Loren Miller for petitioner in No. 145.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States. Robert W. Kenny for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 141.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 314 F. 2d 718.