General

York/Hunter, Inc., Respondent, v. Benjamin Oratz et al., Appellants

281 A.D.2d 542721 N.Y.S.2d 804·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

York/Hunter, Inc., Respondent, v Benjamin Oratz et al., Appellants. [721 NYS2d 804] [MAJORITY] —In an action to set aside the transfer of certain real property as fraudulent, the defendant Benjamin Oratz appeals and the defendant Westmoreland Associates separately appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated December 14, 1999, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motions for summary judgment as there are triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Liberty Co. v Boyle, 272 AD2d 380; Glasser v Kashinsky, 237 AD2d 252; Grumman Aerospace Corp. v Rice, 199 AD2d 365). Bracken, P. J., Goldstein, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.