Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Malory v. McGettrick, Sheriff, 1963 — 375 U.S. 935 · caselaw · US
General
Malory v. McGettrick, Sheriff
375 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 324,
Misc.
Malory v. McGettrick, Sheriff.
Walter S. Haffner for petitioner. John T. Corrigan and Harvey R. Monck for respondent. Briefs of amici curiae, in support of the petition, were filed by Norman Leonard for the National Lawyers Guild, and by Melvin L. Wulf and Ralph Rudd for the American and Ohio Civil Liberties Unions. T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, filed a brief for the State of North Carolina, as amicus curiae, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.