Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Maria Giehl, Respondent, v. Edward Evans et al., Appellants, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
Maria Giehl, Respondent, v. Edward Evans et al., Appellants
155 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maria Giehl, Respondent, v. Edward Evans et al., Appellants.
Qiehl v. Evans, 82 Hun, 613, affirmed.
(Argued February 1, 1898;
decided March 1, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 15, 1894, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a nonsuit, and granting a new trial.
D. Frameis Searle for appellants.
William Kennedy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed , and judgment absolute ordered for the plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Martin, J., not sitting.