Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. John E. Roosevelt, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Edward P. Barker et al., as Commissioners, etc., Respondents, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 646 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. John E. Roosevelt, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Edward P. Barker et al., as Commissioners, etc., Respondents
143 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. John E. Roosevelt, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Edward P. Barker et al., as Commissioners, etc., Respondents.
(Argued June 19, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 18, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari to review an assessment by defendants of the personal estate of Amos Ootting, deceased.
George G. Kobbe for appellant.
D. J. Dean for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Special Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.